(name of blog)

The blog formerly known as “popular lunch table”

Schillinger – Part 2

THE SHILLINGER SYSTEM OF MUSICAL COMPOSITION

2.1 Overview

The origins of Schillinger’s ’system’ and his concept for it are unknown at this stage however; similarities are evident between the foundation of his system (the Theory of Rhythm) and Nikola Tesla’s theoretical work on the invention of alternating current electricity. As is widely known today, alternating current operates on the same principle as sound waves where the periodic motion moves through a 360º ‘phase’ and generates energy. That energy can be increased when the phases of two or more alternating currents are combined. While Schillinger doesn’t speak directly of a connection, he does write extensively of this type of periodic motion as being the scientific basis of all the arts. Furthermore, where phase interference between two cyclical currents generates electrical energy, Schillinger asserts that the ‘interference of periodicities’ (his term for phases or cycles) generates aesthetics.

Understanding Schillinger’s Theory of Rhythm is central to understanding his whole approach. For him, rhythm is not simply a matter of time-rhythm. Schillinger begins by applying rhythm to time durations and then extends it to all other stages of composition – the way in which block harmonies change, intervals in scales and melodies, entrances of counter-themes in counterpoint, distribution of parts through a score, and other processes of composition. These processes are broken down into twelve ‘books’ within the Schillinger System of Composition (hereafter referred to as the SSMC).

2.2 Book I – Theory of Rhythm

Schillinger states at the outset of chapter one of this book that the ‘customary method of musical notation…is inadequate for the analysis and study of rhythmic patterns.’ He then introduces three parallel systems of notation that he will use, initially for the notation of time-durations but ultimately for other components of music and composition in every other book within the SSMC. These are: (1) numbers, (2) graphs and (3) musical notes.

The use of musical notes is self-explanatory and numbers are used in their normal mathematical operations, such as the four actions of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division as well as raising to powers, extracting roots, and for the ease with which they can be used to create permutations of patterns.

However, it is the way in which Schillinger employs graphs that is the key to his system. The graph method he uses is the same used to record variations of components during a time period (stocks in finance; diseases in medicine, etc.). In Theory of Rhythm, Schillinger only deals with time (pitch, intensity and so on are dealt with later). The horizontal coordinate (the abscissa) read from left to right expresses time. The vertical coordinate (known as the ordinate) is used to express the recurrence of a phase, i.e., the moment of attack.

He then goes on with an explanation of basic wave motion and illustrates the way a sine wave is represented in his graph system as a square wave.2 This periodic motion is measured in phase units Schillinger calls periodicities of phases or simply, periodicity. The coincidence of two phases of two difference periodicities intensifies the attack. The recurrence of intensified attacks (“accents”) constitutes musical measures (“bars”). In Schillinger’s words, “The reality of bars depends actually on the placement of attacks, not on the placement of bar lines on music paper.”

Schillinger then illustrates various forms of continuous recurrence of attack groups – i.e., periodicity. The most basic form of periodicity in which all attack groups are identical is called uniform periodicity or monomial periodicity. Using numbers, these could be represented as:

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + …
2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + …
3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + …
n + n + n + n + …

where each number represents a unit of graph measurement on the abscissa.

From here, Schillinger explains the way the numbers and graph representation can then be converted into musical notation simply by using those units to represent note durations. For example, “1″ could be said to represent a quarter note in which case “2″ represents a half note, “3″ a dotted-half note, “4″ a whole note and so on.

What follows after this is what Schillinger calls “generation of resultant rhythmic groups as produced by the interference of two monomial periodicities – that is to say, the way in which one monomial periodicity (say, 3, 3, 3, 3) may be combined with another (say, 4, 4, 4, 4) so as to produce another rhythm.” In its simplest form, the resultant of this type of interference is syncopation. The remainder of Book I is then given over to a thorough investigation of every possible type of interference and the way these resultant patterns (non-uniform periodicities) can themselves be combined to generate an infinite number of rhythmic patterns.

Ex. 1 below shows both rhythm and pitch relationships of Beethoven’s Minuet in G in graph form. The perceptual similarity to a city skyline should also be noted as Schillinger asserted his graph method worked both as an analytical tool and as one that could generate any musical component from anything with a pattern that could be represented in the two dimensions of his graph system. In other words, composers didn’t need to be limited to musical patterns when composing. He also asserted that the aesthetics of any pattern that was visually appealing could be directly translated into something of comparable aural appeal.

schillinger-fig1.jpg

2.3 Book II – Theory of Scales

 The same universality of approach characterizes Schillinger’s Theory of Scales. He classifies any number of tonal units, beginning with a one-unit scale that represents a single note repeated. He also introduces the concept of symmetric scales based on the division of the octave into equal parts (2, 3, 4, 6, 12). Still more new groups are obtained by division of two octaves into three parts, three octaves into four parts, and so on. Interpolating passing notes to fill in gaps between pivotal tones can also create more new scales.

schillinger-fig2.jpg
Familiar and unfamiliar scales can also be created by simple permutation of half-step combinations (2 + 2 + 1 + 2 etc.). Any scale can be created this way.

schillinger-fig3.jpg

Schillinger then relates the resulting progressions to chordal structures derived from these scales. In other words, he explores modulation as a melodic event as well as a harmonic event. Example 4 shows how an octave divided symmetrically into three equal parts can generate a chordal root movement, as was done to great effect by John Coltrane in “Giant Steps”.

schillinger-fig4.jpg

2.4 Book III – Variation by Means of Geometric Projection

This is the slimmest of all the books within the SSMC and perhaps for the non-mathematically minded, the most difficult to penetrate for meaning. The book is divided into two parts: (1) Geometrical Inversions and (2) Geometric Expansions.

In many respects, the processes of inversions that Schillinger explores have origins that date back at least as far as Bach. His graph method provides an easy to interpret visual guide to inversion. The second part with its mathematical permutations used to generate new scale and melodic material has all the hallmarks of pitch class set theory. However, Schillinger uses visual art references to illustrate the way ‘geometric rotation’ can be used to distort an image without losing the connection to the aesthetics of the original. This type of graphic manipulation we take for granted these days in computer applications such as Photoshop.

2.5 Book IV – Theory of Melody

In Schillinger’s conception, melody is the musical projection of a curve that thus can firstly be plotted using basic trigonometric operations and ultimately synthesized. Much of the introduction he writes to this book speaks of his most basic aesthetic that composition, particularly insofar as the composition of melodies is no different to the engineering involved in building a house. He is openly critical at this point about the lingering romantic-era notion of the composer as ‘divinely inspired genius’. It is perhaps this outspoken opinion, more than anything else Schillinger did, that led to music institutions of his time dismissing him and his theories out-of-hand.

Book IV then applies the graph method as a means to represent ‘axes’ of balance. The dynamic quality of a melodic line is determined by alternation of balancing and unbalancing axes, which are melodic fragments directed to and away from the axis of perfect balance. This latter represents the tone of maximum duration in a given melodic fragment. Schillinger further relates the arithmetical summation series with melodies in which each successive interval is the sum of two or more preceding intervals counted in semitone units. He also demonstrates how intervals can my permutated using multiplication so that a Bach fugue would sound like a piece by Debussy in whole tones if the intervals were multiplied by a factor of two, since all the semitones would vanish in the process of intervallic doubling.

2.6 Book V – Theory of Harmony

Schillinger includes an account here of orthodox procedures but its methodological value lies in the greatly generalized idea of stratified harmony in which single tones are formed into two-note, three-note and four-note combinations. These then serve in turn to form larger harmonic structures or, as Schillinger calls them, “pitch assemblages”. He also includes the concept of the voice leading ‘circle’ that produces motion between chords in a systematic manner (see Example 5). Ascending and descending root motion patterns are also described in mathematical (and therefore permutable) terms. Not only is the familiar cycle of fourths explored, but cycles of 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 are also detailed.

schillinger-fig5.jpg

2.7 Book VI – The Correlation of Harmony and Melody

Additional harmonic considerations are shown and exhaustively examined in numerous musical exercises both in this book and the one that follows. The material points out that the familiar Western European system of diatonic harmony is just the tip of the iceberg since, according to Schillinger, “any scale can form the basis of a diatonic or symmetric system from which characteristic intervals and chords may be derived.”

Other things explored here cover 7th, 9th, 11th and 13th chords and techniques for voice-leading upper structures (see Example 6) – hybrids and upper structure triads.

schillinger-fig6.jpg

2.8 Book VII – Theory of Counterpoint

This book is sub-titled ‘The Technology of Correlated Melodies’ and it delves deeply into things such as correlation between two melodies, attack groups in two-part counterpoint, counterpoint with symmetric scales, canons and imitations, and so on. Harmonization of two-part counterpoint is also explored, as are melodic, harmonic and contrapuntal ostinato.

2.9 Book VIII – Instrumental Forms

Instrumental form for Schillinger means “a modification of the original melody and/or harmony which renders them fit for execution on an instrument.” Discussion of attack rhythms first explained in Book I is further explored here in instrumental forms. Further explanation is also given to the concepts of stratified harmony and counterpoint from preceding books.

2.10 Book IX – General Theory of Harmony

The focus on stratified harmony continues here. Schillinger begins with ‘one part harmony’ and ‘one stratum of one-part harmony’. From here he works through two-part harmony, starting with one stratum of two-part harmony, then two parts, then hybrids of those as well as diatonic and symmetric ‘limits’ of compound structures. Similarly, three-part and then four-part harmony is explored before he moves into the area of quartal harmony.

The second half of this book looks deeply into applications of the preceding. Schillinger addresses the issue of melodic and harmonic continuity, accompaniment, composition of canons from strata harmony as well as ‘density’ and its applications to strata.

2.11 Book X – Evolution of Pitch Families

This slim book is a summary of sorts of pitch scales, harmony and melodization of harmony.

2.12 Book XI – Theory of Composition

This book is perhaps the crowning achievement of Schillinger’s ’system’. Here, he methodically explores the components of a composition, beginning with thematic units, moving into thematic continuity and strategies for planning a composition, and finally into ‘Semantic (Connotative) Composition’.

It is in this section that Schillinger introduces what he calls the “psychological dial” – a representation of ‘quadrants’ analogous with the Myers-Briggs Personality Type indicator. A dozen or so chapters are devoted to the semantic basis of music, composition of sonic symbols and finally, the composition of semantic continuity.

2.13 Book XII – Theory of Orchestration

This final book in the SSMC addresses timbral considerations for all orchestral instruments as well as electronic instruments that Schillinger divides into two groups: (1) Varying Electro-Magnetic Field instruments such as the Theremin and (2) Conventional Sources of Sound such as an electrified piano and the Hammond Organ.

The second half of Book XII is devoted to ‘instrumental techniques’ (orchestral forms and so on) and then intensities, attack forms and pitch ranges as they relate to instrumental combinations.

In the final chapter of Book XII, is titled ‘Acoustical Basis of Orchestration’. It’s only a page long and the editors note the original manuscript didn’t finish at this point. However, the publisher decided the material that followed was incomplete and that much of the material on orchestration had already been presented in earlier books.

2 It’s important not to confuse this square wave as representing a sound. It merely represents attack and intensity of a recurring phase cycle.

July 30, 2007 - Posted by altered7th | Brain Grenade | | 6 Comments

6 Comments »

  1. “Book IV then applies the graph method as a means to represent ‘axes’ of balance. The dynamic quality of a melodic line is determined by alternation of balancing and unbalancing axes, which are melodic fragments directed to and away from the axis of perfect balance. This latter represents the tone of maximum duration in a given melodic fragment.”

    This section is very interesting. It reminds me of this symmetrical balancing stuff that I do in my music, only Schillinger has a much more detailed description of it here. I also have a system that involves modulating axes, but in my system of improvisation the balancing and unbalancing occur in the cellular domain, i.e. over very short time spans. Generally only in composition do I use larger time intervals.

    My method was developed to be used in improvisation. It seems like the Schillinger method would be optimal for preconceived composition, where one can calculate as composing. An alternative for improvisation would be to work out certain phrases that could then be combined in various ways. But I have found over the years that it is best to stick with very short fragments, cellular components actually, that can then be used to spontaneously construct larger figures based on the meaning of what you are trying to say musically. However this idea of balancing and unbalancing of the secondary axes in relation to the primary axis is intriguing.

    There is one line on page 352 that is really funny!

    “Once the laws underlying certain structures have been disclosed, anyone can develop any number of structures in a class through the use of a formula. This dose not prevent an artist, who makes an individual selection (whatever the value of such selection may be), from operating under the illusion of as great a freedom as that he imagines he possesses when he creates though the channels of vague intuition and nebulous notions.”

    I’m sure this must have rankled the establishment at the time this book first came out!

    “This book is perhaps the crowning achievement of Schillinger’s ’system’. Here, he methodically explores the components of a composition, beginning with thematic units, moving into thematic continuity and strategies for planning a composition, and finally into ‘Semantic (Connotative) Composition’.

    It is in this section that Schillinger introduces what he calls the “psychological dial” – a representation of ‘quadrants’ analogous with the Myers-Briggs Personality Type indicator. A dozen or so chapters are devoted to the semantic basis of music, composition of sonic symbols and finally, the composition of semantic continuity.”

    This is one of the areas that I am most interested in. The basis of this Psychological Dial was introduced earlier in the chapter 4 of Book IV (Theory of Melody) where he discusses climax and resistance. In fact the Book on Melody is necessary to really understand what Schillinger is getting at here in the Semantic section of Book XI. This is also a good example of something I mentioned in my previous post, the tendency of modern theorist to reintroduce earlier information from the past in terms reflecting more recent ‘advances’ in technology (I do not think that these can always be called ‘advances’, as usually there is something gained and something left out, so this in itself is a kind of ‘balancing’).

    The discussion here reminds me of the old Greek Doctrine of Ethos and the Doctrine of Affections in the late Middle Ages, Renaissance and on into the Baroque period. Although this idea is commonly associated with the Baroque period, like most ideas there is not a clear boundary for when this line of thinking first appeared. I believe that the idea is of a universal form and was always present in music in various locations. However you can clearly see parts of it from Machaut to Palestrina, through Bach and Beethoven and on into modern times. It seems that from the late Middle Ages onward the teaching of the Trivium, and in particular rhetoric, played a large role with musicians in finding ways to be symbolically descriptive through music, and going beyond to create music that functioned as a symbol for the communication of non-musical ideas. Although frequently described as the art of persuasion, I feel that rhetoric was also used as a technique to imbue meaning in musical figures. It seems that chapter 17 of of Book XI is addressing a detailed form of this approach. However I cannot say that what Schillinger is doing is necessarily more detailed than what was discovered in the past, because most of what came before did not survive in written form, especially from ancient times. If the reports that Aristoxenus wrote 453 books are even close to being true (according to the Suda, see http://www.stoa.org/sol/ and search for Aristoxenus) then we see the size of the problem here as Aristoxenus, who wrote on philosophy, history and ethics surely wrote on rhetoric as well, separately and connected to music.

    In fact I have a book called ‘Musica Poetica: Musical-Rhetorical Figures In German Baroque Music’ by Dietrich Bartel (for a review see http://sscm-jscm.press.uiuc.edu/v5/no1/buelow.html ) which attempts to nail down some of the actual musical figures possibly used as symbols to ‘describe’ certain affections. I view these not as fact but as possible examples, nevertheless this book ‘Musica Poetica’ is interesting and it seems to be an early version of this semantic chapter of Schillinger, without the mathematical rigor of course.

    However Ptolemy (2nd century A.D.) did attempt to make correspondences between musical structures and various other subjects in what seems like an attempt to look into the symbolic nature of music, building up a lexicon of musical symbols. Also in the writings of Plato (5th-4th century B.C.) and especially in Aristides Quintilianus 3rd century A.D.) there are some references to details dealing with the ancient Greek conception of Ethos (which along with Logos and Pathos were the three ‘modes of persuasion’ described by Aristotle in his ‘On Rhetoric’ (see: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/rhetoric.1.i.html ). Plato’s many references to the authority of Damon the Athenian as a kind of Ethos expert (he talks of gapped Tetrachords, particular Harmoniai and certain Rhythmic Modes as being able to project certain characteristics strong enough to influence behavior) show that this concept was well established by the 5th century B.C. in Greece. The Baroque idea of the Affections seems to be along these lines of thinking. Following Aristotle, if we take Pathos (directed towards the emotion), Logos (appeal to logic) and Ethos (appeal to character or ethics), it can be seen how the construction of musical symbols along these lines would be more effective (and affective) than just using emotional appeal (the normal method internalized and used by most musicians). I believe that the Schillinger method moves along these lines, especially using Logos and Ethos in greater proportion. However the numerous metaphors used throughout his texts show that Schillinger is no stranger to Pathos either. Also his quotes from Aristotle (page 1411 for example) and other ancient sources along with references to music from other lands show that he was well versed in all these matters and more.

    Comment by mbase | July 31, 2007

  2. Sorry about the delay on your comment, mbase1235 — I think it automatically holds them for moderation if you include links. But it looks like you just posted this today, so fortunately it appears that you didn’t have to wait too long.

    I’m impressed with the knowledgeable level of discourse so far, considering the fact that I set up this blog with a “see who posts and see what happens” mindset and no pre-set topic. Hopefully others won’t be too intimidated to chime in!

    Comment by Rodney Toady | July 31, 2007

  3. “Following Aristotle, if we take Pathos (directed towards the emotion), Logos (appeal to logic) and Ethos (appeal to character or ethics), it can be seen how the construction of musical symbols along these lines would be more effective (and affective) than just using emotional appeal (the normal method internalized and used by most musicians). I believe that the Schillinger method moves along these lines, especially using Logos and Ethos in greater proportion. However the numerous metaphors used throughout his texts show that Schillinger is no stranger to Pathos either. Also his quotes from Aristotle (page 1411 for example) and other ancient sources along with references to music from other lands show that he was well versed in all these matters and more.”

    The balancing of Pathos, Logos and Ethos is something I hadn’t considered with respect to Schillinger, but it makes a lot of sense. Insofar as Pathos, if we call that the ‘intuitive’ element, Schillinger says (I think in the Theory of Melody book) that composers shouldn’t just use his methods without applying aesthetic judgement. In fact, he says the composer “has a responsibility” to apply his own aesthetics to anything his methods generates.

    The application of such a judgement are likely the key to understanding why Schillinger students such as Gershwin, Glenn Miller, and John Barry (to name just three) are all so stylistically different despite all learning the same ’system’. My guess is this is because the word ’system’ itself has been misinterpreted by Schillinger’s critics to be synonomous with ‘method’. I’ve mentioned elsewhere that Schillinger uses the analogy of a biological system (music metaphors such as pulse, breathing and movement become literal in this sense) could be expanded to a cosmic proportion. In this expansion, the ’system’ is analogous with the universe in which, as Schillinger explicitly states, music is a ’special case’ of sound and the way we perceive and respond to it. Similarly, music and hearing exist in the lower end of the frequency spectrum with light and vision existing on that same continuum in the same way that rhythm and pitch are interconnected.

    Comment by altered7th | August 1, 2007

  4. This may be a relatively uneducated thing to mention, but I’ve thought about doing pieces where the tempo matches the key the song is in. For example, if it’s in the key of C, it would be 61.32 bpm, or 122.64 bpm. Just taking the frequency and cutting it in half until it’s within the tempo & rhythm range of the Everything Spectrum. I wonder if that would have any impact on the overall consonance of the music? We generally think of rhythm as being in its own separate universe from pitch, the same way we think of colors of light as being in their own separate universe.

    Comment by Rodney Toady | August 1, 2007

  5. I changed my nick to mbase (instead of mbase1235). I agree with what you say. It is clear to me that Schillinger was heavy into Harmonics, something we touched on in the Aristoxenus blogs. There was a student of Schillinger’s, Zvi Keren, who then went on to teach the method in his own way. Here is a quote from an interview of his…

    “In addition, I hoped to share with my students a spiritual attitude towards composition. As a religious person, I felt that composers invent much as the Almighty creates. This belief, an offspring of Schillinger’s theories of rhythm, recognizes affinities between rhythmic motion in music and the rhythmic frequencies that permeate the world. More specifically, Schillinger perceived the simultaneous combination of a number of frequencies, e.g., a person’s pulse beating regularly, the earth turning on its axis once every 24 hours, and the earth encircling the sun once every year, as new rhythmic entities. Similarly, in music, rhythmic modifications and recombinations alter musical phrases in infinite ways. I hoped that my students would align such processes of rhythmic variations with relentless Divine creations of new physiognomies.”

    (more of the interview is at: http://www.biu.ac.il/hu/mu/min-ad02/alona.html )

    So it seems that the types of things that we find from Ptolemy to Hans Kayser we also see in Schillinger, this tendency to connect everything through vibration and cycle. I feel that one cannot move along this path and not feel a sense of awe at the immensity of Nature and the connectedness of everything, a feeling that would certain be expressed either religiously or through one of the esoteric Mystery School approaches.

    In other words, I think we agree that there was certainly this esoteric underpinning to much of what Schillinger taught, and this is certainly one of the most overlooked aspects of his work.

    Comment by mbase | August 1, 2007

  6. Esoteric thinking was also much in vogue when Schillinger was growing up and of course, Scriabin – still a highly popular and influential figure in Schillinger’s time in Russia – was notable for his mysticism.
    Thanks for the link. I had read that article last year but inadvertently forgot to save a copy. Now I have :)

    Comment by altered7th | August 1, 2007


Leave a comment